The other thing that stopped me was when the author talked about null curriculum and how it is as important as what schools teach. Eisner mentioned how there are subjects and areas that schools emphasize such as Math, English and Science, but others such as Economics and Law are neglected. This connected me because when I was growing up, I was taught the way that Eisner mentioned. Now looking back after growing up and entering the workforce, other subjects that were neglected by schools such as economics are as important because they teach us how our social systems work. This made me believe that recognizing null curriculum is important when deciding what should be included in our school system.
After reading the article, I now believe that 'curriculum' shouldn't just be a set of expectations, learning outcomes and knowledge of subjects that we give to students. Other things, such as the importance of life skills and social norms of society that students learn from curriculum, are equally as important. The BC Provincial Curriculum emphasizes the "understand", "know" and "do" part which aligns with Eisner's ideas when he talked about meeting the learning standards. However, the author also encouraged us to look beyond the explicit curriculum offered to students. I believe that considering Eisner's idea of implicit curriculum and null curriculum within the BC Provincial Curriculum would be a step forward for the education system. While we focus on how to prepare students for the future, we also have to think about the importance of renewing curriculum when necessary.
You make an interesting connection between Eisner’s ideas about the implicit curriculum and the ways schools prepare students for future careers. Given that Eisner was writing before the technological changes we are experiencing today, what aspects of this implicit preparation do you think are still relevant, and what might schools need to rethink about preparing students for an increasingly technology-driven workplace?
ReplyDelete